Trust accounting is the operational backbone of bank wealth management, yet independent scrutiny of leading platforms is virtually nonexistent. This Datos Matrix report closes that gap, evaluating six vendors – FIS, Fi-Tek, Infovisa, SEI, SS&C, and Cheetah – through live demonstrations, detailed RFI responses, and interviews with 16 institutions representing US$1 billion to US$150 billion in assets under management or administration. The central finding: every vendor in this study has at least one reference client that built or purchased a workaround to close a native capability gap – and the pattern has matured into a product category. The report identifies the specific gaps each vendor’s clients have addressed, assesses true AI maturity versus roadmap promises (spoiler: no vendor has deployed generative AI in full production), analyzes custodian connectivity depth as the primary differentiator, and resets realistic conversion timelines to two to three years, not the 12 months typically budgeted. Wealth management executives will find practical guidance on asking the right questions during vendor evaluation, separating platform pricing from managed services, understanding client retention as switching cost rather than satisfaction, and aligning vendor technical architecture with institutional buyer profile.
Clients of Datos Insights’ Wealth Management practice may access this report.
About the Author
Gregory O'Gara
Greg O'Gara serves as a Strategic Advisor for Datos Insights' Wealth Management practice, focusing on research and analysis of the North American wealth management industry. He has strong expertise in financial advisor technology, platform architecture, and investment delivery models, with specialized knowledge in custody and clearing operations, retail trading ecosystems, investor engagement, and regulatory frameworks. His advisory work helps firms...