Volume growth is accelerating across institution types, geographies, and portfolio segments at a pace that legacy operational models were not built to absorb. First-party fraud is compounding the pressure, arriving through the same channels and with the same apparent credibility as a legitimate dispute, while consuming identical operational resources and corrupting the transaction data issuers rely on for fraud decisioning. This report examines how issuers are responding operationally: through evolving staffing models, network-facilitated pre-dispute tools, proprietary case management platforms, and emerging AI-driven automation. Key findings reveal that a small number of leading institutions are deploying machine learning to reduce false positive declines and route dispute cases to automated resolution pathways. For most institutions, rules-based systems and manual processes remain the norm. Consequently, the gap between the leading edge and the mainstream is widening.
Clients of Datos Insights’ Fraud & AML service can download this report.
This report mentions Mastercard and Visa.
About the Author
Jim Mortensen
Jim Mortensen is a Strategic Advisor in Datos Insights’ Fraud & AML practice, covering identity, fraud, and data security issues. His coverage includes the trends associated with fraud in the financial services sector, solutions to detect and mitigate fraud, and the impacts of AI and deepfakes on fraud threats and remediation. Jim has been in the financial services industry for...
Other Authors
Serpil Hall
Serpil Hall is a Strategic Advisor at Datos Insights, where she supports global financial institutions, payments providers, and technology firms with research driven insights and strategic guidance. Her work focuses on strengthening fraud defences through data led strategies, advanced behavioural analytics, and modern fraud technology architectures. With more than 20 years of industry experience, Serpil is a recognised expert in...