Report

First-Party Fraud and the Case forDispute-Enriched Authorizations

The data to fix false declines exists; most financial institutions just don’t connect it.
/

Dispute and chargeback volumes are rising faster than the operations most financial institutions built to manage them, and first-party fraud is a primary driver. As cardholders deliberately dispute transactions they authorized, the contaminated chargeback data that issuers rely on to calibrate authorization rules produces a damaging feedback loop: tighter fraud controls generate more false declines for legitimate customers while doing nothing to stop the abusers who pass every authentication check. This report examines how first-party fraud distorts dispute datasets, documents the organizational and technical silos that prevent chargeback intelligence from reaching authorization systems in real time, and makes the case that closing this gap is the highest-leverage action available to issuers managing rising dispute volumes. The report provides a three-layer implementation framework covering data infrastructure, organizational alignment, and governance, along with six concrete recommendations for FIs ready to move from reactive dispute management to a more integrated approach.

Clients of Datos Insights’ Fraud & AML service can download this report.

Related Content

Get Summary Report

"*" indicates required fields

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Name*